Credentialing Compliance in Nursing Homes: How to Avoid Fines and Stay Audit-Ready

Credentialing compliance in nursing homes goes beyond mere record-keeping—it's a fundamental aspect of healthcare operations that ensures every staff member is qualified, licensed, and legally permitted to work. Effective credentialing safeguards residents, maintains regulatory compliance, and protects facilities from legal and financial penalties. Failure to manage credentialing effectively can lead to denied reimbursements, staff shortages, fines, and even closure.

This article explores how nursing homes can streamline credentialing processes, stay audit-ready, and avoid penalties by adopting best practices, leveraging technology, and staying informed about federal and state regulations.

The Consequences of Poor Credentialing Compliance

Poor credentialing management can result in significant operational, financial, and legal repercussions:

• Staffing Shortages: Delays in credential approval prevent staff from working, leading to staffing gaps that compromise resident care and facility operations.
• Denied Reimbursements: Medicaid and Medicare may reject claims for services provided by improperly credentialed staff, negatively impacting revenue.
• Financial Losses: Facilities can incur substantial losses due to unbillable services and the costs associated with correcting compliance issues.
• Legal Penalties: Regulatory bodies may impose fines, sanctions, or exclude facilities from federal programs for non-compliance.
• Litigation Risks: Employing unqualified or excluded individuals can lead to lawsuits alleging negligence or malpractice.
• Reputational Damage: Non-compliance harms the facility's reputation, affecting its ability to attract residents and quality staff.

Understanding Federal and State Regulations

Compliance with federal and state regulations is essential for nursing homes to operate legally and avoid penalties.

Federal Regulations: Key Sections in the CMS State Operations Manual

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) State Operations Manual outlines specific credentialing and compliance requirements:

• 42 CFR §483.35(d): Nurse Aide Competency
  Requires listing nurse aides in the state nurse aide registry and have completed a state-approved training and competency evaluation program.
• 42 CFR §483.70: Administration
  Mandates that facilities ensure all personnel are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with applicable state laws and monitor staff for federal and state exclusions to avoid employing disqualified individuals.
• 42 CFR §483.75: Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement
  Requires nursing homes to maintain effective programs that include maintaining current credentials for all staff and contractors.
• 42 CFR §483.95: Training Requirements
  Mandates ongoing training for staff, including abuse prevention, infection control, CPR certification, and behavioral health training.

Enforcement Actions:

The Office of Inspector General (OIG) regularly conducts audits and has authority to impose civil monetary penalties on facilities that employ excluded individuals or fail to meet credentialing requirements.

State Regulations: A Closer Look

State regulations may impose additional credentialing and background check requirements. Here’s how some states enforce these regulations:

• Virginia:
  • 12VAC30-122-120: Requires Medicaid providers to conduct monthly exclusion checks on all employees and contractors to ensure they are not excluded from federal healthcare programs. Non-compliance can lead to fines, repayment demands, and termination from the Medicaid program.
  • Comparison to Other States: Virginia's mandate for monthly screenings is stricter compared to states like the District of Columbia, which requires quarterly checks.
  • Impact of Non-Compliance: Facilities in Virginia have faced financial penalties and repayment obligations for failing to comply with monthly exclusion monitoring.
• Texas:
  • Requirements: Providers must check both the OIG's List of Excluded Individuals/Entities (LEIE) and the Texas Medicaid Exclusion List before hiring and on a monthly basis. Failure to comply can result in civil monetary penalties.
• New York:
  • Requirements: Medicaid providers must screen employees monthly against both federal and state exclusion lists, including the New York State Office of the Medicaid Inspector General (OMIG) exclusion list.
• California:
  • Requirements: Providers are required to screen both state and federal exclusion lists to prevent hiring ineligible staff, ensuring compliance with Medicaid regulations.

Implementation Challenges:

• Multi-State Operations: Facilities operating in multiple states must navigate varying state-specific requirements, increasing the complexity of compliance efforts.
• Frequency of Checks: The requirement for monthly exclusion checks can be resource-intensive, especially for facilities with high staff turnover.

Exclusion Monitoring and Its Role in Preventing Fraud

The OIG's LEIE is crucial in preventing fraud and abuse in federal healthcare programs. Employing excluded individuals can result in significant fines and legal action, including:

• Civil Monetary Penalties: Up to $10,000 for each item or service provided by an excluded person.
• Assessment: Up to three times the amount claimed for services involving an excluded individual.

Challenges in Exclusion Monitoring:

• Data Management: Keeping track of multiple exclusion lists (federal and state) and ensuring timely checks can be challenging.
• False Positives: Common names may result in false matches, requiring additional verification efforts.

Best Practices:

• Automated Screening: Utilize software solutions that automatically screen all required exclusion lists.
• Documentation: Maintain thorough records of all exclusion checks and any actions taken in response to findings.

Financial Implications of Credentialing Delays

Credentialing delays can have significant financial implications:

• Revenue Losses: Delayed credentialing can lead to unbillable services, directly impacting the bottom line.
• Operational Costs: Additional expenses may be incurred from hiring temporary staff or paying overtime to existing staff to cover shortages.

• Impact on Different Sized Facilities:
  • Small Facilities: May lack the resources to absorb financial losses, making compliance critical for survival.
  • Large Chains: Non-compliance can lead to cumulative losses across multiple facilities and increased risk of widespread regulatory penalties.

Legal Ramifications of Non-Compliance

Non-compliance with credentialing regulations can lead to:

• Civil and Criminal Penalties: Facilities may face lawsuits, fines, and criminal charges, especially if negligence leads to patient harm.
• Loss of Licensure: Repeated violations can result in the revocation of operating licenses.
• Exclusion from Federal Programs: Facilities may be barred from participating in Medicare and Medicaid programs.

Notable Cases:

• On June 5, 2024, The Estates of St. Louis, LLC (Estates), Saint Louis, Missouri, entered into a $300,000 settlement agreement with OIG. The settlement agreement resolves allegations that Estates employed an individual who was excluded from participating in any Federal health care program. OIG's investigation revealed that the excluded individual, a charge nurse, provided items or services that were billed to Federal healthcare programs. Acting Reviewing Official Nicole Caucci represented OIG.

Best Practices from Industry Leaders

Learning from top-performing nursing homes can provide valuable insights:

Best Practices Include:

1. Automate Credentialing Processes
   • Benefits: Increases efficiency, reduces errors, and ensures timely renewals.
2. Conduct Regular Training
   • Focus Areas: Regulatory updates, compliance procedures, and the importance of credentialing.
3. Standardize Procedures Across Locations
   • Consistency: Develop uniform policies to ensure all facilities meet the same compliance standards.
4. Leverage Technology Solutions
   • Centralized Data: Use cloud-based platforms for real-time access and management of credentialing data.
5. Engage Compliance Experts
   • Consultation: Work with legal and compliance professionals to stay updated on regulatory changes.

Comparison of Credentialing Software Solutions

While PERLA is a notable option, other credentialing platforms offer various features:

Perla, Inc.

• Features: focuses on streamlining and automating credentialing processes and document preservation in the long-term-care industry. 
• Pros: Easy-to-use interface that reduces training time.  Low costs to allow smaller to midsize organizations to implement automation. 
• Cons: Smaller facilities with fewer staff may find that some advanced features go unused. Additionally, while user-friendly, facilities with very manual processes might require time for adjustment during the initial setup phase.

Testimonials:

An administrator from a mid-sized nursing home commented, “Perla has drastically improved how we manage credentials. The time saved on manual tasks allows us to focus on resident care, and the automated reminders have ensured we never miss an expiration date.”

Symplr Credentialing

• Features: Comprehensive credentialing and provider management solutions.
• Pros: Customizable workflows, integration capabilities.
• Cons: Higher cost, may require extensive training.

CredentialStream by VerityStream

• Features: End-to-end provider lifecycle management, including onboarding and compliance tracking.
• Pros: Scalable, robust reporting tools.
• Cons: Implementation can be complex.

GreenLight Medical

• Features: Focuses on streamlining credentialing and supply chain processes.
• Pros: User-friendly interface, strong customer support.
• Cons: May lack specialized features for nursing homes.

Pros and Cons of Automated Solutions vs. Manual Methods

• Automated Solutions:
  • Pros: Efficiency, accuracy, scalability, real-time compliance tracking.
  • Cons: Initial investment, reliance on technology infrastructure.
• Manual Methods:
  • Pros: Lower upfront costs, direct control over processes.
  • Cons: Time-consuming, prone to errors, difficult to manage at scale.

Testimonials:

An HR manager from a nursing home that adopted CredentialStream noted, "Automating our credentialing process has not only saved us time but also significantly reduced our compliance risks."

Future Trends in Credentialing and Compliance

Evolving Healthcare Laws

• Post-Pandemic Adjustments: Changes in telehealth regulations and staffing requirements necessitate updated credentialing practices.
• Regulatory Changes: New federal and state mandates may introduce additional compliance requirements.

Technological Advancements

• Artificial Intelligence (AI):some text
  • Applications: AI can automate data verification, flag compliance issues, and predict credentialing delays.
• Blockchain Technology:
  • Potential: Offers secure, decentralized storage of credentialing information, enhancing data integrity.

Impact of the 80/20 Rule

• Efficiency Imperative: With the Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) 80/20 rule allocating at least 80% of payments to direct care, facilities must optimize administrative processes to operate within reduced budgets.
• Operational Strategies:
  • Streamlining Processes: Efficient credentialing reduces administrative costs, aligning with the financial constraints imposed by the rule.

How to Avoid Credentialing Fines and Penalties

1. Implement Automated Credentialing

• Action: Adopt credentialing software to automate the tracking and management of staff credentials.
• Benefit: Reduces errors, accelerates onboarding, and ensures timely renewals.

2. Automate Exclusion Monitoring

• Action: Use tools that automatically check federal and state exclusion lists monthly.
• Benefit: Minimizes risk of employing excluded individuals and incurring penalties.

3. Utilize Cloud-Based Solutions

• Action: Leverage cloud platforms for centralized data storage and access.
• Benefit: Enhances visibility, facilitates remote audits, and improves data security.

4. Leverage Reporting and Audit Readiness

• Action: Generate real-time compliance reports to monitor credentialing status.
• Benefit: Simplifies audit preparation and helps identify and address compliance gaps proactively.

5. Ensure Compliance Across Multiple Locations

• Action: Standardize credentialing processes using technology that supports multi-site management.
• Benefit: Consistency in compliance efforts reduces overall risk and improves operational efficiency.

Conclusion: Achieving Compliance and Operational Excellence

Credentialing compliance is critical for nursing homes, impacting resident safety, legal standing, and financial health. By adopting best practices, investing in technology, and staying informed about regulatory changes, facilities can streamline credentialing processes, reduce risks, and allocate more resources to direct patient care.

Implementing an efficient credentialing system not only helps avoid fines and penalties but also enhances overall operational efficiency. As the healthcare landscape continues to evolve, proactive compliance management will be essential for the success and sustainability of nursing homes.

‍